{"id":34994,"date":"2026-11-06T23:05:23","date_gmt":"2026-11-06T23:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/?p=34994"},"modified":"2026-11-07T01:06:08","modified_gmt":"2026-11-07T01:06:08","slug":"premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

All 10 matches | 6-8 November 2026 | European reaction, team news and the mathematics of price<\/em><\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Bournemouth to win at Ipswich, goals at Brighton, and selective positions in Fulham-Newcastle and Manchester United-Aston Villa form the core of this week’s BrokerStorm analysis. Arsenal have the strongest outright win probability, but their very short market price tells a different betting story. Our aim is to identify where the football case, the probability and the available price work together.<\/p>\n

We start with the probabilities displayed in BrokerStorm Prediction Lab, then assess each fixture against the latest European results, domestic form and player availability. Finally, we translate those probabilities into fair prices and expected value. The team-news assessment is our editorial interpretation alongside the published model snapshot; the percentages below are the values read from the tool, not manually revised figures.<\/p>\n

Reading this article:<\/strong> 1 = home win, X = draw, 2 = away win. BTTS means both teams to score. Expected goals shown beside a fixture are its pre-match goal projection, not a prediction of an exact score. Market prices are decimal indicative market odds at the time of analysis<\/strong>, checked on 6 November. They are comparison snapshots, not reserved or guaranteed executable quotes.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The complete Premier League probability board<\/h2>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Fixture<\/th>\n1<\/th>\nX<\/th>\n2<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\nO2.5<\/th>\nBTTS<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Everton – Coventry<\/td>\n44.9%<\/td>\n26.5%<\/td>\n28.6%<\/td>\n1.43-1.08<\/td>\n45.8%<\/td>\n50.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Leeds – Tottenham<\/td>\n38.7%<\/td>\n27.2%<\/td>\n34.1%<\/td>\n1.28-1.18<\/td>\n44.7%<\/td>\n50.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Arsenal – Hull<\/td>\n71.9%<\/td>\n17.8%<\/td>\n10.3%<\/td>\n2.20-0.70<\/td>\n55.5%<\/td>\n44.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fulham – Newcastle<\/td>\n53.1%<\/td>\n21.3%<\/td>\n25.6%<\/td>\n2.05-1.38<\/td>\n66.6%<\/td>\n65.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Forest – Man City<\/td>\n35.9%<\/td>\n23.2%<\/td>\n40.9%<\/td>\n1.57-1.68<\/td>\n63.1%<\/td>\n64.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brighton – Brentford<\/td>\n49.9%<\/td>\n20.6%<\/td>\n29.5%<\/td>\n2.17-1.65<\/td>\n73.5%<\/td>\n71.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Palace – Liverpool<\/td>\n23.1%<\/td>\n21.9%<\/td>\n55.0%<\/td>\n1.20-1.96<\/td>\n61.1%<\/td>\n60.0%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ipswich – Bournemouth<\/td>\n15.4%<\/td>\n17.7%<\/td>\n66.9%<\/td>\n1.11-2.46<\/td>\n69.2%<\/td>\n61.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sunderland – Chelsea<\/td>\n35.8%<\/td>\n23.2%<\/td>\n41.0%<\/td>\n1.56-1.68<\/td>\n62.9%<\/td>\n64.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Man Utd – Aston Villa<\/td>\n52.8%<\/td>\n21.1%<\/td>\n26.1%<\/td>\n2.09-1.43<\/td>\n68.2%<\/td>\n66.6%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Source: BrokerStorm Prediction Lab. Under 2.5 and BTTS No in the match sections are the complements of the displayed Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes probabilities. All fixtures and kick-off times have been checked against the Premier League schedule. [1]<\/a><\/sup>[2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The strongest home-win probability is Arsenal at 71.9%. Bournemouth lead the away-win list at 66.9%, followed by Liverpool at 55.0%. For goals, Brighton-Brentford stands out at 73.5% for Over 2.5 and 71.6% for BTTS. Manchester United-Aston Villa and Ipswich-Bournemouth also carry substantial goal expectations. These are different markets, so their percentages describe different events rather than interchangeable levels of bet quality.<\/p>\n

How we turn football probabilities into a betting decision<\/h2>\n

1. Expected goals and the score distribution<\/h3>\n

Prediction Lab describes its team-strength inputs as this season’s non-penalty expected goals, adjusted for the opponents faced, with venue-specific attacking and defensive strengths. Non-penalty xG measures the quality of chances outside penalties. Opponent adjustment helps distinguish chances created against strong defences from the same raw output against weaker opposition. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n

The standard Poisson framework illustrates how an expected scoring rate becomes a set of score probabilities. If a team’s expected goals are represented by lambda, its probability of scoring k goals is:<\/p>\n

P(G = k) = exp(-lambda) x lambda^k \/ k!<\/pre>\n
For home and away goal rates, an independent Poisson baseline multiplies the two goal probabilities to form a score grid. Football models can also adjust low-scoring outcomes; the Dixon-Coles research is a foundational example of that approach. These equations explain the standard mathematical framework behind score modelling. Our market calculations use Prediction Lab’s displayed probabilities directly. [3]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Let P(i,j) denote the model probability of the home team scoring i and the away team scoring j. The markets follow by adding the relevant score cells:<\/p>\n
Home win = sum of P(i,j) where i > j\r\nDraw = sum of P(i,j) where i = j\r\nAway win = sum of P(i,j) where i < j\r\nOver 2.5 = sum of P(i,j) where i + j >= 3\r\nBTTS = sum of P(i,j) where i >= 1 and j >= 1<\/pre>\n
This explains why a match can have a strong goals signal but a relatively balanced result market. Brighton-Brentford has 3.82 expected goals in total, yet Brighton’s win probability is 49.9%. Several scoring paths support Over 2.5, including 2-1, 1-2 and 2-2, while only some support the home win.<\/p>\n
2. Fair odds, implied probability and expected value<\/h3>\n
A fair price is the reciprocal of the estimated probability. It has no bookmaker margin. The fair prices in this article are calculated from the displayed, rounded percentages, so the final decimal may differ slightly from a price computed from the application’s unrounded internal value.<\/p>\n
Fair decimal odds = 1 \/ p\r\nMarket break-even probability = 1 \/ offered odds\r\nExpected net return per unit staked = p x offered odds - 1<\/pre>\n
For Brighton-Brentford Over 2.5, p = 0.735. Fair odds are about 1.36. At the observed 1.64, the price requires a 61.0% strike rate, compared with our model estimate of 73.5%. The model-implied expected net return is 0.735 x 1.64 – 1 = +20.5% per unit staked. That is a probability-based expectation, not a promised return from this individual match. [38]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Arsenal show why probability alone is insufficient. A 71.9% win chance corresponds to fair odds of about 1.39. At an indicative 1\/7, or approximately 1.143, the market requires an 87.5% win rate. The model therefore prefers Arsenal to win but does not support backing that price. [37]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
3. Our price threshold and exchange commission<\/h3>\n
To make the shortlist actionable, we use an editorial threshold of at least 5% model-implied expected return before commission. This is a selection rule for this article, not a probability output or an empirically optimised staking rule. The minimum prices are rounded upwards to the next cent.<\/p>\n
Minimum decimal price for +5% model EV = 1.05 \/ p<\/pre>\n
For an isolated exchange back bet with commission c charged on winnings, the net-win multiplier changes. The relevant calculation is:<\/p>\n
Net expected return = p x [1 + (odds - 1) x (1 - c)] - 1<\/pre>\n
As a worked example only, at 2% commission Brighton Over 2.5 at 1.64 would have model-implied net EV of approximately +19.6%. Use the actual commission applicable to the account and market. With multiple positions in one market, commission must be assessed on the market’s net result.<\/p>\n
A positive model-price comparison is necessary for our value label. A high probability with a poor price does not qualify; a low-probability outcome can qualify mathematically but remains much more likely to lose than win.<\/p>\n
\n
1. Everton vs Coventry City<\/h2>\n
Fri 6 Nov, 20:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
44.9%<\/td>\n26.5%<\/td>\n28.6%<\/td>\n1.43 – 1.08<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 45.8% | Under 2.5 54.2% | BTTS Yes 50.2% | BTTS No 49.8%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Form, preparation and team news<\/h3>\n
Everton approach Friday after consecutive cup and league wins over Newcastle, including Monday’s 1-0 league success. David Moyes is monitoring Jarrad Branthwaite after cramp forced him off late at St James’ Park; the defender was hoped to be available. Jack Grealish has been ruled unavailable. Coventry are without Aurele Amenda and Haji Wright, with Josh Eccles and Luke Woolfenden also expected to remain out. Bobby Thomas and Frank Onyeka face fitness checks. [4]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The domestic scoring pattern supports a measured approach: seven of Everton’s opening nine league matches finished below three goals. Coventry, however, arrive after a 3-1 league win over Sunderland. Everton’s Monday-to-Friday turnaround is also relevant to their preparation, even though this is not a post-European fixture for them. [5]<\/a><\/sup>[1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
What the model is saying<\/h3>\n
Everton have the highest individual outcome probability at 44.9%, but the combined chance of a draw or Coventry win is 55.1%. Their 1.43 projected goals are only modestly above Coventry’s 1.08. The game is therefore less one-sided than a short home price suggests. Under 2.5 is 54.2%, a preference rather than an overwhelming goals call, and BTTS is almost perfectly balanced at 50.2%.<\/p>\n
Where the price matters<\/h3>\n
The observed match-result price of 4\/6 for Everton requires a 60.0% win rate, well above 44.9%. Coventry at 18\/5, or 4.60, produces +31.6% model-implied EV from a 28.6% win probability. That makes the away win a speculative price opportunity, not our most likely result. Coventry or draw would require approximately 1.91 for our +5% threshold; that is a target price, not an observed double-chance quote. [37]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Everton are the likeliest single winner, but we pass their short win price. Under 2.5 becomes a candidate at 1.94+<\/strong>. Coventry win at 4.60 is a higher-variance model-value alternative; its probability of failing is still 71.4%.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
2. Leeds United vs Tottenham Hotspur<\/h2>\n
Sat 7 Nov, 12:30 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
38.7%<\/td>\n27.2%<\/td>\n34.1%<\/td>\n1.28 – 1.18<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 44.7% | Under 2.5 55.3% | BTTS Yes 50.1% | BTTS No 49.9%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Form, returns and attacking availability<\/h3>\n
Tottenham have won three consecutive league matches, while Leeds have scored only twice across their last five matches and were beaten 2-0 at Bournemouth last weekend. That contrast deserves attention, although Tottenham’s recent victories over Chelsea and Palace both involved opponents being reduced to ten men. [9]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Leeds’ latest official update is more encouraging on Joe Rodon: he has returned to full team training and is in contention for the squad. Noah Okafor and Anton Stach remain major doubts after individual work only. Dominic Calvert-Lewin had a foot setback, with Daniel Farke cautiously optimistic about his availability. Tottenham can call on Rodrigo Bentancur after his suspension; Lucas Bergvall and Tosin Adarabioyo had been targeting this game, while Mudryk and Savio were expected back after the international break. [6]<\/a><\/sup>[7]<\/a><\/sup>[8]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Why the model does not chase Tottenham’s winning run<\/h3>\n
Leeds lead the model by just 4.6 percentage points: 38.7% against Tottenham’s 34.1%, with the draw at 27.2%. This is the most evenly balanced of the Saturday result markets. Expected goals of 1.28-1.18 point to a total of 2.46, supporting Under 2.5 at 55.3%. BTTS at 50.1% offers no convincing directional separation.<\/p>\n
Our editorial reading is that Tottenham’s improved confidence meets a Leeds side whose attacking availability needs careful attention. The stronger evidence lies in a relatively contained scoring expectation, rather than a claim that either side should dominate.<\/p>\n
Value assessment<\/h3>\n
At the observed 1.92, Under 2.5 offers +6.2% model-implied EV, above our 1.90 minimum. Leeds at 2.78 also clear their calculated 2.72 threshold, but the uncertainty over attacking personnel makes the goals angle the cleaner editorial preference. Tottenham at 2.76 fall below their fair price of approximately 2.93. [40]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Under 2.5 at 1.90+<\/strong> is the preferred price-led position. At the observed 1.92 the margin is modest, so this is a secondary selection rather than a headline pick.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
3. Arsenal vs Hull City<\/h2>\n
Sat 7 Nov, 15:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
71.9%<\/td>\n17.8%<\/td>\n10.3%<\/td>\n2.20 – 0.70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 55.5% | Under 2.5 44.5% | BTTS Yes 44.7% | BTTS No 55.3%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Arsenal return from Prague with another victory<\/h3>\n
Arsenal won 2-1 away to Slavia Prague in the Champions League, with Noni Madueke and Viktor Gyokeres scoring. It followed their 1-0 league victory at Liverpool. Their domestic position is strong: four wins from four home league games, with only two goals conceded. Hull have drawn five of their first nine league matches and arrive after a 2-2 draw with Ipswich. [12]<\/a><\/sup>[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Bukayo Saka remains out, with Arteta confirming on Friday that his absence will continue for several weeks. Ezri Konsa is a doubt after coming off in Prague, while William Saliba has returned to the squad following a back problem. Max Dowman is suspended. Hull are missing suspended midfielder Matt Crooks; Darko Gyabi, Charlie Hughes, Matt Targett and Eliot Matazo are among their injury absences, with Lucas Gourna-Douath also a doubt. [11]<\/a><\/sup>[10]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The highest win probability on the board<\/h3>\n
Arsenal’s 71.9% is comfortably the strongest win probability in this Premier League round. The 2.20-0.70 goal projection underlines the imbalance, while Hull’s win probability is only 10.3%. BTTS No, at 55.3%, is more likely than BTTS Yes, but it is nowhere near the strength of the home-win signal. An Arsenal win and an Arsenal clean sheet are different events.<\/p>\n
A strong prediction can still be an unattractive bet<\/h3>\n
The indicative Arsenal price of 1\/7 implies 87.5%, compared with 71.9% in Prediction Lab. Its model-implied EV is about -17.8%. We would need approximately 1.47 for the article’s +5% threshold. Hull at 17.00 produce a large positive model-price difference, but a 10.3% win probability also means an 89.7% chance of losing the bet. That is an outsider position, not a sensible description of the most likely match outcome. [37]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Over 2.5 is 55.5%, so a very short goals quote would not be justified either. The +5% threshold is 1.90. We also avoid assigning an invented probability to Arsenal win-and-Over: that combination requires its own joint score-distribution calculation.<\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Arsenal to win<\/strong> is our strongest outright prediction. No home-win bet at the observed short price.<\/strong> Prediction strength and price quality must be assessed separately.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
4. Fulham vs Newcastle United<\/h2>\n
Sat 7 Nov, 15:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
53.1%<\/td>\n21.3%<\/td>\n25.6%<\/td>\n2.05 – 1.38<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 66.6% | Under 2.5 33.4% | BTTS Yes 65.2% | BTTS No 34.8%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The midfield news strengthens Fulham’s case<\/h3>\n
Fulham return to Craven Cottage after drawing 1-1 at Aston Villa. Ryan Sessegnon is available again after his three-match suspension, and Tom Cairney has already resumed substitute appearances after a knee injury. The published pre-match update reports no Fulham injury absences. [14]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Newcastle lost 1-0 at home to Everton on Monday and have a clearer selection problem. The club confirms Joelinton is unavailable and Jacob Ramsey serves a one-match suspension. Matias Fernandez-Pardo has returned to training after a virus, but that does not automatically establish readiness to start. Tino Livramento and goalkeeper Ewen Jaouen remain reported absentees, while Lewis Miley is a fitness doubt. [13]<\/a><\/sup>[14]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
A home edge with meaningful scoring potential<\/h3>\n
Fulham have a 53.1% win probability against Newcastle’s 25.6%, with the draw at 21.3%. The projected 2.05-1.38 goals make this more than a narrow 1-0 home-win story: Over 2.5 reaches 66.6% and BTTS 65.2%. Newcastle remain capable of contributing even while Fulham are the preferred side.<\/p>\n
Our football interpretation is that Newcastle’s missing midfield options could make it harder to control transitions and protect the centre-backs. That supports scrutiny of Fulham’s attack, while Newcastle’s remaining forward options make a clean-sheet-based home selection less attractive than the outright win or total goals.<\/p>\n
Two genuine price-led routes<\/h3>\n
Fulham at 2.16 offer +14.7% model-implied EV against fair odds of about 1.88. Over 2.5 at 1.83 offer +21.9% against a fair price of about 1.50. BTTS at 1.55 are much less appealing: the corresponding EV is only +1.1%, below our chosen threshold. The existence of a strong BTTS probability therefore does not make it the best-priced market. [39]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Over 2.5 at 1.58+<\/strong> is the leading goals position; the observed 1.83 is attractive on the model. Fulham win at 1.98+<\/strong> is the result-market alternative. Treat them as related views of one match, not independent selections.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
5. Nottingham Forest vs Manchester City<\/h2>\n
Sat 7 Nov, 17:30 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
35.9%<\/td>\n23.2%<\/td>\n40.9%<\/td>\n1.57 – 1.68<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 63.1% | Under 2.5 36.9% | BTTS Yes 64.4% | BTTS No 35.6%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
City’s European recovery meets Forest’s underlying chance creation<\/h3>\n
Manchester City recovered from consecutive league defeats by winning 3-2 away to RB Leipzig in the Champions League. Forest lost 2-0 at Brentford and are still searching for their first home league win. Their official preview highlights 152 shots but only six goals, indicating a substantial gap between the chances they have generated and their actual scoring output. [16]<\/a><\/sup>[15]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The latest club report takes priority on availability: Igor Jesus has returned to training, but Nicolas Dominguez is out following a recurrence of his hamstring problem. City are without Antoine Semenyo, while Nico O’Reilly is not fully fit. A return to training should be distinguished from confirmation of a place in the starting XI. [15]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The model sees a contest, not a procession<\/h3>\n
City lead at 40.9%, Forest are 35.9%, and the draw is 23.2%. The goal projection of 1.57-1.68 is strikingly close. This is one of the largest gaps between the reputation of the away side and the balance of the model’s result distribution. Forest or draw totals 59.1%.<\/p>\n
The goals markets are more decisive: Over 2.5 is 63.1% and BTTS 64.4%. Our interpretation is that Forest’s opportunity creation gives them a route to score, while City’s attacking quality keeps their own goal expectation high. Wednesday’s trip to Germany also adds a selection and recovery consideration before Saturday evening.<\/p>\n
Value and the outsider distinction<\/h3>\n
At the observed 1.78, Over 2.5 offer +12.3% model-implied EV. BTTS at 1.63 are approximately +5.0%, just below our strict upward-rounded minimum of 1.64. Forest’s 4.88 win quote produces +75.2% model-implied EV, a very large model-price divergence; City at 1.73 produce -29.2%. Forest remain only a 35.9% win proposition despite that price gap. [41]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Prefer Over 2.5 at 1.67+<\/strong> as the balanced market angle. Forest win is an explicitly speculative alternative. City’s name and European victory do not justify backing them below the model’s price requirement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
6. Brighton & Hove Albion vs Brentford<\/h2>\n
Sun 8 Nov, 14:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
49.9%<\/td>\n20.6%<\/td>\n29.5%<\/td>\n2.17 – 1.65<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 73.5% | Under 2.5 26.5% | BTTS Yes 71.6% | BTTS No 28.4%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Brighton’s European momentum and Brentford’s returning midfielder<\/h3>\n
Brighton followed their 1-0 league win at Manchester City with a 1-0 Conference League victory at Getafe. They enter the weekend third, with 24 goals from nine league matches. Brentford arrive after a 2-0 win over Forest and have had the longer preparation period for Sunday. [19]<\/a><\/sup>[17]<\/a><\/sup>[18]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Yehor Yarmoliuk is available again after suspension. Brentford reported no fresh injury problems, but Fabio Carvalho and Rico Henry remain sidelined; Antoni Milambo was not yet ready, and Josh Dasilva was building towards a first-team return. Brighton had ruled Ferdi Kadioglu, Pascal Struijk and Femi Azeez out of the Getafe match. Kadioglu was being targeted for possible Sunday availability, while Struijk and Azeez remained fitness assessments. Evan Ferguson is still listed unavailable. [18]<\/a><\/sup>[20]<\/a><\/sup>[21]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The strongest goals profile in the round<\/h3>\n
The model projects 2.17 Brighton goals and 1.65 Brentford goals, or 3.82 combined. Over 2.5 is 73.5%; BTTS is 71.6%. Brighton win is only 49.9%, which makes the goals markets the clearer way to express the model’s positive view of this fixture. The detailed Match Lab also gives Over 3.5 a 53.1% probability. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
European travel means Brighton’s final selection matters, but it does not erase the central football argument: both teams have a meaningful projected contribution. A Brentford goal would threaten the home-win bet while potentially helping the goals position.<\/p>\n
The strongest combination of likelihood and price<\/h3>\n
Over 2.5 at the observed 1.64 return +20.5% model-implied EV. BTTS at 1.55 return +11.0%. Both clear our respective minimum prices of 1.43 and 1.47. Brighton win at 1.99 are almost exactly fair, with a slightly negative model EV. The more likely scoring event is also the better-priced route here. [38]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
For a more demanding alternative, Over 3.5 require 1.98 for +5% model EV. A BTTS-and-Over-2.5 combination can be calculated without assuming independence: BTTS excludes only the 1-1 score when we require at least three goals. With the tool showing 1-1 at 7.8%, the combined probability is approximately 71.6% – 7.8% = 63.8%<\/strong>. That implies fair odds near 1.57 and a target of 1.65+<\/strong>. This is a derived probability and a target price, not a directly quoted combined market. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Over 2.5<\/strong> is the headline selection. BTTS is an alternative; Over 3.5 or BTTS + Over 2.5 offer more ambitious routes at the stated thresholds. These selections overlap heavily and should not be treated as independent bets.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
7. Crystal Palace vs Liverpool<\/h2>\n
Sun 8 Nov, 14:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
23.1%<\/td>\n21.9%<\/td>\n55.0%<\/td>\n1.20 – 1.96<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 61.1% | Under 2.5 38.9% | BTTS Yes 60.0% | BTTS No 40.0%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Two European evenings, two different recovery demands<\/h3>\n
Liverpool twice led at Fenerbahce before losing 3-2 in the Champions League. Andoni Iraola had made five starting changes, with Alexander Isak scoring after coming off the bench. Palace drew 1-1 with Hoffenheim in the Europa League on Thursday, with Daichi Kamada equalising late. Liverpool therefore return from Istanbul, while Palace have the shorter Thursday-to-Sunday interval. [22]<\/a><\/sup>[24]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Jean-Philippe Mateta is suspended domestically after his dismissal against Tottenham. Jorgen Strand Larsen returned to Palace’s European matchday squad, offering a potential replacement, while Ismaila Sarr is expected to miss out. Liverpool are without Jeremie Frimpong, Hugo Ekitike, Conor Bradley and Giovanni Leoni. Ryan Gravenberch remains a fitness question after a heel problem; Dominik Szoboszlai has returned to action. [23]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Liverpool are favoured, but the price asks for more<\/h3>\n
Liverpool’s 55.0% win chance is the second-highest away probability of the round, behind Bournemouth. Palace are 23.1%, with a draw at 21.9%. The projected goals of 1.20-1.96 support an away preference, while Over 2.5 is 61.1% and BTTS 60.0%.<\/p>\n
Our editorial interpretation is that Liverpool’s attacking options give them a clear route to exploit Palace’s difficulties, but the European result also shows why the match cannot simply be reduced to a rebound narrative. Palace’s striker change matters to the attacking shape; it is not a reason to overwrite the model percentage without a new calculation.<\/p>\n
A correct directional pick is not automatically value<\/h3>\n
The observed Liverpool quote of 4\/6, or 1.667, implies 60.0%, above the model’s 55.0%, and yields approximately -8.3% model EV. Their fair price is 1.82 and our +5% entry threshold is 1.91. An observed Over 2.5 quote of 1.50 also falls short: its model EV is -8.4%. [37]<\/a><\/sup>[45]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Liverpool to win<\/strong> is the prediction, but pass the observed short price<\/strong>. Reconsider the away win at 1.91+, Over 2.5 at 1.72+, or BTTS at 1.75+. These are price conditions, not a claim those prices are available.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
8. Ipswich Town vs Bournemouth<\/h2>\n
Sun 8 Nov, 14:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
15.4%<\/td>\n17.7%<\/td>\n66.9%<\/td>\n1.11 – 2.46<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 69.2% | Under 2.5 30.8% | BTTS Yes 61.3% | BTTS No 38.7%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Bournemouth arrive with form and European momentum<\/h3>\n
Bournemouth won 3-1 at Sparta Prague to extend their winning sequence to seven matches in all competitions. They trailed before Sparta were reduced to ten men; substitutes Tyler Adams, Evanilson and Rayan supplied the second-half goals. The result matters, and so does the fact that important attacking options were used from the bench rather than starting. [25]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Ipswich are without a win in three league matches after a defeat at Manchester City and draws against Forest and Hull. Sasa Lukic could return after additional recovery time for a groin problem. Bournemouth are without Alex Toth following hamstring surgery, while Alex Scott has returned to training and remains a selection assessment. Marco Rose had also identified European travel and the subsequent trip to Ipswich as part of the week’s workload management. [27]<\/a><\/sup>[26]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The clearest away-win signal<\/h3>\n
Bournemouth’s 66.9% win probability is more than four times Ipswich’s 15.4%; the draw is 17.7%. Expected goals are 1.11-2.46. The distribution therefore supports both an away win and a substantial scoring contribution from the visitors. Over 2.5 is 69.2%, while BTTS is lower at 61.3%.<\/p>\n
Our interpretation is that Bournemouth’s form and attacking depth support the model’s direction. The Thursday turnaround is relevant to the lineup, but the available evidence of rotation makes it too simplistic to assume every regular starter carries the same workload. Ipswich’s longer preparation is a counterpoint, not sufficient on its own to reverse the away preference.<\/p>\n
A headline value selection<\/h3>\n
The verified odds-comparison page showed Bournemouth at 19\/20, or 1.95. Against a 66.9% model probability, that represents approximately +30.5% model-implied EV. Fair odds are about 1.49, and the article’s minimum price is 1.57. Even allowing for the distinction between quoted and executable prices, this is a clear numerical value candidate at the observed snapshot. [44]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
For a goals alternative, Over 2.5 would require 1.52+ for our +5% threshold. An away-win-and-Over combination could appeal stylistically, but its probability must come from the joint score grid; multiplying 66.9% by 69.2% would wrongly assume independence.<\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Bournemouth to win at 1.57+<\/strong>. The observed 1.95 makes this our leading outright selection when combining model probability, current form and price. Over 2.5 is an alternative expression of the same attacking view.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
9. Sunderland vs Chelsea<\/h2>\n
Sun 8 Nov, 14:00 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
35.8%<\/td>\n23.2%<\/td>\n41.0%<\/td>\n1.56 – 1.68<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 62.9% | Under 2.5 37.1% | BTTS Yes 64.3% | BTTS No 35.7%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Sunderland’s European setback and Chelsea’s availability watch<\/h3>\n
Sunderland lost 2-0 at home to Dinamo Zagreb on Thursday and made four changes at half-time. Their preparation for Chelsea follows that Europa League workload. Habib Diarra, Romaine Mundle and Dan Ballard remain unavailable, with Ballard’s recovery target extending into December. Omar Alderete is suspended for the league match, while Nordi Mukiele is expected to emerge from concussion protocols in time, subject to clearance. [29]<\/a><\/sup>[28]<\/a><\/sup>[32]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Chelsea won 2-0 against Manchester United last weekend. Emiliano Martinez has returned to training in a protective mask after jaw surgery, although training participation does not confirm a start. Reece James, Joao Pedro, Maxence Lacroix and Jamie Gittens remain reported absentees. The contrast in preparation favours Chelsea, whose week has centred on training rather than Thursday European action. [30]<\/a><\/sup>[31]<\/a><\/sup>[32]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The model prefers Chelsea only narrowly<\/h3>\n
Chelsea are 41.0%, Sunderland 35.8%, and the draw 23.2%. Expected goals of 1.56-1.68 make the statistical contest much closer than the league-table narrative alone might suggest. BTTS reaches 64.3% and Over 2.5 is 62.9%.<\/p>\n
The editorial case needs both sides of the story. Sunderland’s missing defenders can help Chelsea create, but the hosts’ recent attacking struggles and Chelsea’s own absences mean the goals interpretation deserves more caution than Brighton’s. We keep the model-price opportunity visible without presenting Sunderland as a likely winner.<\/p>\n
Prefer a goals price to a short Chelsea win quote<\/h3>\n
Chelsea at 2.09 produce -14.3% model EV because the fair price is about 2.44. Sunderland at 3.75 produce +34.3%, but remain a low-confidence outright proposition. Over 2.5 at 1.93 produce +21.4%; BTTS at 1.70 produce +9.3%. Both goal prices exceed their respective 1.67 and 1.64 minimums. [42]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Over 2.5 at 1.67+<\/strong> is a secondary model-value selection, with BTTS as an alternative. Chelsea are the model’s narrow winner preference, but the observed win price does not offer value.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
10. Manchester United vs Aston Villa<\/h2>\n
Sun 8 Nov, 16:30 GMT \/ UK time.<\/strong> Greece: two hours later. Full-time markets cover 90 minutes plus added time. [2]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Home win<\/th>\nDraw<\/th>\nAway win<\/th>\nExpected goals<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
52.8%<\/td>\n21.1%<\/td>\n26.1%<\/td>\n2.09 – 1.43<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Goals:<\/strong> Over 2.5 68.2% | Under 2.5 31.8% | BTTS Yes 66.6% | BTTS No 33.4%. [1]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
Contrasting Champions League results<\/h3>\n
United overturned a two-goal deficit to beat Roma 3-2 at Old Trafford. Villa lost 3-0 at Barcelona, ending their perfect start to the Champions League league phase. Both played on Tuesday, so Villa’s travel is relevant, but the calendar itself gives both sides a substantial interval before Sunday. [33]<\/a><\/sup>[35]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
United’s own preview reports a hamstring problem for Carlos Baleba after the Roma game, while Lisandro Martinez serves a suspension. Luke Shaw, Manuel Ugarte, Marcus Rashford and Benjamin Sesko have been unavailable; Patrick Dorgu has returned to training. Villa have confirmed Matty Cash is suspended, Aaron Wan-Bissaka faces a late fitness test, and Amadou Onana and Matteo Ruggeri remain out. Brian Madjo returns to contention after being unavailable for the Barcelona match. [34]<\/a><\/sup>[36]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
The goals distribution is stronger than the result conviction<\/h3>\n
United lead at 52.8%, with Villa 26.1% and the draw 21.1%. The projected 2.09-1.43 goals put the total at 3.52. Over 2.5 is 68.2%, and BTTS is 66.6%. United are the preferred side, but a high-scoring contest is the more likely event.<\/p>\n
Our football reading is that United’s comeback provides encouragement in attack, while their defensive suspension and Villa’s right-back availability issues make it difficult to build the preview around defensive security. Villa still have routes to create even if the model places them second in the result market.<\/p>\n
Why Over beats BTTS on price<\/h3>\n
United at 2.23 offer +17.7% model-implied EV. Over 2.5 at 1.65 offer +12.5%. BTTS at 1.50 are approximately break-even, with model EV of -0.1%, despite their apparently attractive 66.6% probability. Price makes Over 2.5 the more useful goals selection. [43]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
BrokerStorm verdict:<\/strong> Over 2.5 at 1.54+<\/strong> is the main goals call. United win at 1.99+<\/strong> is the price-led result alternative. The observed 1.65 and 2.23 both qualify; BTTS at 1.50 does not.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
Our final shortlist: likelihood, value and selection priority<\/h2>\n
The following ranking combines the numerical model-price comparison with the football assessment. It is not a ranking by raw expected value alone: a 10.3% outsider can show a large price gap while still losing far more often than it wins. Prices are indicative snapshots, and model EV is calculated before any exchange commission.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Selection<\/th>\nModel<\/th>\nFair<\/th>\nObserved<\/th>\nMin. +5%<\/th>\nModel EV<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Bournemouth win<\/td>\n66.9%<\/td>\n1.49<\/td>\n1.95<\/td>\n1.57<\/td>\n+30.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brighton-Brentford Over 2.5<\/td>\n73.5%<\/td>\n1.36<\/td>\n1.64<\/td>\n1.43<\/td>\n+20.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fulham-Newcastle Over 2.5<\/td>\n66.6%<\/td>\n1.50<\/td>\n1.83<\/td>\n1.58<\/td>\n+21.9%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Man Utd-Villa Over 2.5<\/td>\n68.2%<\/td>\n1.47<\/td>\n1.65<\/td>\n1.54<\/td>\n+12.5%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Fulham win<\/td>\n53.1%<\/td>\n1.88<\/td>\n2.16<\/td>\n1.98<\/td>\n+14.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manchester United win<\/td>\n52.8%<\/td>\n1.89<\/td>\n2.23<\/td>\n1.99<\/td>\n+17.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Forest-Man City Over 2.5<\/td>\n63.1%<\/td>\n1.58<\/td>\n1.78<\/td>\n1.67<\/td>\n+12.3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sunderland-Chelsea Over 2.5<\/td>\n62.9%<\/td>\n1.59<\/td>\n1.93<\/td>\n1.67<\/td>\n+21.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Leeds-Spurs Under 2.5<\/td>\n55.3%<\/td>\n1.81<\/td>\n1.92<\/td>\n1.90<\/td>\n+6.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Price sources for this table: Bournemouth [44]; Brighton [38]; Fulham [39]; Manchester United [43]; Forest [41]; Sunderland [42]; Leeds [40]. The first four rows are the headline selections; the two outright home wins are alternatives within matches already featured. The final three are secondary positions.<\/p>\n
The most likely standard-market outcomes<\/h3>\n
Across the 1X2, Over\/Under 2.5 and BTTS markets covered here, the leading probabilities are Brighton-Brentford Over 2.5 (73.5%), Arsenal win (71.9%), Brighton-Brentford BTTS (71.6%), Ipswich-Bournemouth Over 2.5 (69.2%) and United-Villa Over 2.5 (68.2%). This likelihood list differs from the value shortlist because the price can make a strong probability unattractive.<\/p>\n
The largest outsider price differences<\/h3>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Outsider<\/th>\nWin chance<\/th>\nObserved price<\/th>\nModel EV<\/th>\nChance bet loses<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Hull win<\/td>\n10.3%<\/td>\n17.00<\/td>\n+75.1%<\/td>\n89.7%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Forest win<\/td>\n35.9%<\/td>\n4.88<\/td>\n+75.2%<\/td>\n64.1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sunderland win<\/td>\n35.8%<\/td>\n3.75<\/td>\n+34.3%<\/td>\n64.2%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Coventry win<\/td>\n28.6%<\/td>\n4.60<\/td>\n+31.6%<\/td>\n71.4%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
These are explicit model-price divergences, not the four most likely winners. Hull and Coventry prices come from the observed match-result listing; Forest and Sunderland prices come from the individual comparison pages. [37]<\/a><\/sup>[41]<\/a><\/sup>[42]<\/a><\/sup><\/p>\n
For a more adventurous goals position with a substantially higher hit probability than those outsiders, Brighton Over 3.5 is 53.1% and requires 1.98+ for the chosen threshold. Brighton BTTS + Over 2.5 is approximately 63.8% and requires 1.65+. The latter is derived from the displayed BTTS and 1-1 probabilities. We do not claim a combined-market quote was verified.<\/p>\n
What this round tells us<\/h2>\n
The strongest practical theme is the separation of outcome prediction from price selection. Arsenal can be the clearest predicted winner while Bournemouth represent the more attractive outright bet. Brighton can be the preferred side while total goals offer the stronger probability and price combination. United-Villa can have a high BTTS probability while the available Over 2.5 price is still preferable.<\/p>\n
European football adds a second layer. Bournemouth’s comeback in Prague supports their momentum and highlights the value of their substitutes. Brighton’s success in Spain brings confidence but also a shorter recovery cycle. Liverpool return after an avoidable reversal in Istanbul; City return with a win but a Wednesday-to-Saturday turnaround. United and Villa arrive after contrasting Tuesday results, with specific defensive and midfield selection issues that matter more than a generic claim of European fatigue.<\/p>\n
Our four headline positions are therefore Bournemouth to win, Brighton-Brentford Over 2.5, Fulham-Newcastle Over 2.5 and Manchester United-Aston Villa Over 2.5<\/strong>, at prices meeting the thresholds above. Fulham and United outright are alternative routes; Forest-City goals, Sunderland-Chelsea goals and Leeds-Spurs Under 2.5 form the secondary watchlist. Each selection stands on its own match analysis. We do not recommend treating related markets as independent or presenting the shortlist as a guaranteed accumulator.<\/p>\n
The decision rule remains consistent: read the match, quantify the outcome, compare the price, and act only when the offered return compensates for the estimated probability. A probability is an estimate of how often an event would occur across comparable situations; it is never a promise about one ninety-minute match.<\/p>\n
Publication record:<\/strong> Prepared 6 November 2026. Prediction Lab snapshot captured from the authenticated application on that date; its displayed Premier League dataset covers 88 matches through 31 October 2026. Team-news and price research checked on 6 November. New reports and confirmed lineups should be dated when this article is updated. All value calculations use the displayed rounded percentages.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
Sources and further reading<\/h2>\n
Numbered references identify the evidence behind reported results, team news, scheduling and price snapshots. The tactical interpretation, market comparison and shortlist are BrokerStorm editorial analysis. Links are clickable in both editions. Sources with developing team news should be read with their publication dates; the latest club statement takes priority over older previews.<\/p>\n
[1]<\/strong> BrokerStorm Prediction Lab: authenticated model snapshot, captured 6 November 2026<\/a><\/p>\n
[2]<\/strong> Premier League: confirmed November fixture amendments<\/a><\/p>\n
[3]<\/strong> Dixon & Coles (1997): Modelling Association Football Scores<\/a><\/p>\n
[4]<\/strong> Everton FC: Branthwaite fitness update and Coventry team news, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[5]<\/strong> Racing Post: Everton-Coventry form and preview, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[6]<\/strong> Leeds United: Rodon, Calvert-Lewin, Okafor and Stach update, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[7]<\/strong> Tottenham Hotspur: De Zerbi on potential injury returns, 31 October<\/a><\/p>\n
[8]<\/strong> Tottenham Hotspur: team news and Bentancur suspension status, 30 October<\/a><\/p>\n
[9]<\/strong> Racing Post: Leeds-Tottenham form and preview, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[10]<\/strong> TNT Sports: Arsenal-Hull team news and form, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[11]<\/strong> Reuters: Arteta update on Saka, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[12]<\/strong> SK Slavia Praha: Slavia 1-2 Arsenal match report, 4 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[13]<\/strong> Newcastle United: Jaissle on Joelinton and Fernandez-Pardo, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[14]<\/strong> TNT Sports: Fulham-Newcastle team news and form, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[15]<\/strong> Nottingham Forest: official Manchester City preview, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[16]<\/strong> Racing Post: Forest-City preview and Leipzig result, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[17]<\/strong> Brentford FC: Brighton match preview and season context, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[18]<\/strong> Brentford FC: Yarmoliuk, Dasilva and Milambo update, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[19]<\/strong> Brighton & Hove Albion: Getafe 0 Albion 1 report listing, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[20]<\/strong> BBC report via Yahoo: Brighton fitness update before Getafe, 4 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[21]<\/strong> Premier Injuries: Brighton availability, updated 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[22]<\/strong> Liverpool FC: Fenerbahce 3-2 Liverpool report, 4 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[23]<\/strong> bet365 News: Palace-Liverpool team news, 5-6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[24]<\/strong> The Guardian: Europa and Conference League results, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[25]<\/strong> Sky Sports: Sparta Prague 1-3 Bournemouth report, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[26]<\/strong> BBC via Yahoo: Rose on Toth surgery and European travel, 4 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[27]<\/strong> Sports Mole: Ipswich-Bournemouth preview and team news, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[28]<\/strong> Sunderland AFC: Le Bris injury update, 4 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[29]<\/strong> Dinamo Zagreb: official Sunderland 0-2 Dinamo report, 5 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[30]<\/strong> Chelsea FC: training update and Martinez return to the pitch<\/a><\/p>\n
[31]<\/strong> The Standard: Chelsea availability ahead of Sunderland, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[32]<\/strong> Sports Mole: Sunderland-Chelsea preview and team news, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[33]<\/strong> Manchester United: official 3-2 Roma match report, 3 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[34]<\/strong> Manchester United: Aston Villa match preview and team news<\/a><\/p>\n
[35]<\/strong> Aston Villa: Barcelona 3-0 Villa report, 3 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[36]<\/strong> Aston Villa: team news for Manchester United, 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[37]<\/strong> talkSPORT BET: Premier League match-result odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[38]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Brighton-Brentford odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[39]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Fulham-Newcastle odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[40]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Leeds-Tottenham odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[41]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Nottingham Forest-Manchester City odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[42]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Sunderland-Chelsea odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[43]<\/strong> SportyTrader: Manchester United-Aston Villa odds, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[44]<\/strong> Oddschecker: Ipswich-Bournemouth win market, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
[45]<\/strong> Paddy Power: Palace-Liverpool goals markets, accessed 6 November<\/a><\/p>\n
 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
All 10 matches | 6-8 November 2026 | European reaction, team news and the mathematics of price Bournemouth to win at Ipswich, goals at Brighton, and selective positions in Fulham-Newcastle and Manchester United-Aston Villa form the core of this week’s BrokerStorm analysis. Arsenal have the strongest outright win probability, but their very short market price… Weiterlesen »Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":5033,"featured_media":34999,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"off","neve_meta_content_width":70,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[418],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-strategies"],"yoast_head":"\nPremier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"de_DE\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Brokerstorm.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/brokerstorm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Brokerstorm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@broker_storm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@broker_storm\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Verfasst von\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Brokerstorm\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"27\u00a0Minuten\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Brokerstorm\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/10dbc5510b4bac11e7b1f373eb2d6844\"},\"headline\":\"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5333,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Strategies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/\",\"name\":\"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00\",\"description\":\"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg\",\"width\":1500,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Football in front of match odds, win probability percentages and market charts\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/2026\\\/11\\\/06\\\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value\"}],\"name\":\"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value\"},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Brokerstorm.com\",\"description\":\"Betfair Broker & Betfair Alternative\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"de\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Brokerstorm\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/brokerstorm-logo-schema.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/10\\\/brokerstorm-logo-schema.png\",\"width\":720,\"height\":240,\"caption\":\"Brokerstorm\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/brokerstorm\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/broker_storm\",\"https:\\\/\\\/t.me\\\/brokerstorm\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/channel\\\/UCpBRLcKDlamaDNdUCJruCLg\"],\"legalName\":\"REDCOIN LIMITED\",\"email\":\"info@brokerstorm.com\",\"contactPoint\":{\"@type\":\"ContactPoint\",\"contactType\":\"customer support\",\"email\":\"info@brokerstorm.com\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/de\\\/contact\\\/\",\"availableLanguage\":[\"English\"]}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/brokerstorm.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/10dbc5510b4bac11e7b1f373eb2d6844\",\"name\":\"Brokerstorm\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"de\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Brokerstorm\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm","description":"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/","og_locale":"de_DE","og_type":"article","og_title":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm","og_description":"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.","og_url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/","og_site_name":"Brokerstorm.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/brokerstorm","article_published_time":"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1500,"height":1000,"url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Brokerstorm","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@broker_storm","twitter_site":"@broker_storm","twitter_misc":{"Verfasst von":"Brokerstorm","Gesch\u00e4tzte Lesezeit":"27\u00a0Minuten"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Brokerstorm","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#\/schema\/person\/10dbc5510b4bac11e7b1f373eb2d6844"},"headline":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value","datePublished":"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/"},"wordCount":5333,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg","articleSection":["Strategies"],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/","name":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value | BrokerStorm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg","datePublished":"2026-11-06T23:05:23+00:00","dateModified":"2026-11-07T01:06:08+00:00","description":"Detailed Premier League predictions for 6-8 November 2026 with BrokerStorm Prediction Lab probabilities, team news, European context and value analysis.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"de","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/11\/premier-league-predictions-model-probabilities.jpg","width":1500,"height":1000,"caption":"Football in front of match odds, win probability percentages and market charts"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/2026\/11\/06\/premier-league-predictions-6-8-november-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value"}],"name":"Premier League Predictions: Where Our Model Finds Probability and Value"},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/","name":"Brokerstorm.com","description":"Betfair Broker & Betfair Alternative","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"de"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#organization","name":"Brokerstorm","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/brokerstorm-logo-schema.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/brokerstorm-logo-schema.png","width":720,"height":240,"caption":"Brokerstorm"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/brokerstorm","https:\/\/x.com\/broker_storm","https:\/\/t.me\/brokerstorm","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCpBRLcKDlamaDNdUCJruCLg"],"legalName":"REDCOIN LIMITED","email":"info@brokerstorm.com","contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","contactType":"customer support","email":"info@brokerstorm.com","url":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/contact\/","availableLanguage":["English"]}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/#\/schema\/person\/10dbc5510b4bac11e7b1f373eb2d6844","name":"Brokerstorm","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"de","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7136894d281231ae50724cf027250371111d29c5324be1522c6f88d861032955?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Brokerstorm"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5033"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34994"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35002,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34994\/revisions\/35002"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/34999"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brokerstorm.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}